String Quartet No.9 (McEwen, John Blackwood)
|
It is unlikely that this work is public domain in the EU, or in any country where the copyright term is life-plus-70 years. However, it is in the public domain in Canada (where IMSLP is hosted) and other countries where the term is life-plus-50 years (like China, Japan, Korea and many others worldwide). As this work was first published before 1923 or failed to meet notice or renewal requirements to secure statutory copyright, it is almost certainly public domain in the USA as well. |
|
|
|---|
Sheet Music
Full Scores
Complete Score
*#218073 - 1.23MB, 39 pp. - (0) - V/V/19 - 61x⇩
PDF scanned by Sibley Library
Schissel (2012/5/11)
Color Cover
*#218074 - 1.32MB, 1 pp. - (0) - V/V/19 - 14x⇩
PDF scanned by Sibley Library
Schissel (2012/5/11)
London: Anglo-French Music Co., 1917. Plate A. F. M. Cº. 1.
Public Domain - Non-PD EU [tag/del]
This file is part of the Sibley Mirroring Project.
Javascript is required for this feature.
General Information
| Work Title | String Quartet No.9 |
|---|---|
| Alternative Title | String Quartet No.7 (current numbering) ; Threnody |
| Composer | McEwen, John Blackwood |
|---|---|
| Key | E♭ minor |
| Movements/Sections | 1 (Lento - Allegro molto - Poco meno mosso - Lento) |
| Year/Date of Composition | 1916 |
| First Publication | 1917 |
| Dedication | To F.D. d'A. |
| Average Duration | 16 minutes |
| Piece Style | Early 20th century |
| Instrumentation | 2 Violins, viola, cello |
Misc. Comments
The consensus numbering of McEwen's string quartets has changed since they were published, as he excluded his first two quartets in an accounting of them (apparently for Grove's Dictionary ca.1950? the last of them dates from 1947 which would make sense.) -String Quartet No.8 is now referred to as Quartet No.6 (in A major, Biscay), e.g. and this work is no.7. It was, however, published as quartet no.9.
It is also consensus to refer to this quartet as being in E♭ major, but for what reason eludes me. Mystification, assuredly. Minor-mode takes up so much of the work that by most definitions I think the mode would probably be taken reasonably to be minor, the major-mode conclusion being unexceptional...

